top of page

Requesting Data, Code, and Models of Published Works

Writer: Genik OfficeGenik Office

Access to data, code, and models from published research is essential for validation, replication, and building upon existing work. However, requesting these materials requires professionalism and respect for the original authors. This blog provides guidance on how to effectively request such resources to foster collaboration and advance scientific knowledge.


1. Understand the Importance of Sharing

Recognize the benefits to both parties.

  • Advancing Science: Access to original data and code enables verification of results and accelerates further research.

  • Building Relationships: Professional requests can lead to collaborations and networking opportunities with other researchers.

  • Ethical Considerations: Transparency in research promotes trust and integrity within the scientific community.


2. Review the Publication and Supplementary Materials

Before reaching out, ensure that the information isn't already available.

  • Check Supplementary Files: Many journals include additional materials alongside the main article. Thoroughly examine these resources.

  • Visit the Authors' Websites: Researchers often host data and code on their institutional pages or personal websites.

  • Search Repositories: Platforms like GitHub, Figshare, or Dryad may house the materials you need.


3. Crafting a Professional Request

Communication should be clear, courteous, and concise.

  • Formal Email Structure: Use a professional greeting, clear subject line (e.g., "Request for Data from [Paper Title]"), and a polite closing.

  • Introduce Yourself: Briefly state your name, affiliation, and research interests to provide context.

  • Specify Your Request: Clearly mention the data, code, or models you are seeking and reference the specific publication.

  • Explain Your Purpose: Outline how you intend to use the materials, emphasizing academic and non-commercial intentions.

  • Express Appreciation: Thank the authors for their time and contributions to the field.


4. Follow Up Respectfully

If you don't receive a response, proceed with consideration.

  • Wait Reasonably: Allow at least two weeks for a reply, considering the authors' potential commitments.

  • Polite Reminder: Send a courteous follow-up email reiterating your request and expressing understanding of their busy schedule.

  • Alternative Contacts: If necessary, reach out to co-authors or the corresponding author's administrative assistant.


5. Acknowledge and Credit Appropriately

Show respect for the authors' work.

  • Cite the Original Work: Include proper citations in any publications or presentations that utilize the provided materials.

  • Offer Co-authorship: If the use of the data significantly contributes to new findings, consider inviting the original authors as co-authors.

  • Inform of Outcomes: Share your results with the authors, fostering goodwill and potential future collaborations.


6. Be Prepared for Limitations

Understand that authors may have valid reasons for declining.

  • Confidentiality Agreements: Data involving sensitive information may be restricted due to privacy concerns.

  • Intellectual Property Rights: Patents or pending publications might prevent sharing at the current time.

  • Resource Constraints: Authors may lack the time or resources to prepare and share complex datasets or code.


7. Explore Alternative Solutions

If your request is denied, consider other avenues.

  • Public Datasets: Seek out publicly available data that can serve a similar purpose.

  • Data Simulation: Create synthetic data based on the descriptions provided in the publication.

  • Collaborate with Other Researchers: Network within your field to find others who have access to similar resources.


Conclusion

Requesting data, code, and models from published works is a valuable practice that can enhance research quality and foster collaboration. By approaching authors professionally and respectfully, you increase the likelihood of a positive response and contribute to a culture of openness and cooperation in the scientific community.


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page